- BofA Securities settled a DOJ spoofing probe for $5.56 million over 2014–2020 Treasury market manipulation, with no admission of liability.
- Retail investors view the modest payout as a slap on the wrist, reinforcing distrust that markets favor big banks over ordinary investors.
Bank of America Securities has agreed to fork over $5.56 million to settle a U.S. Department of Justice probe into alleged market manipulation by its former traders, but for everyday investors who feel perpetually shortchanged by Wall Street, the deal feels like just another rigged game.
The resolution, announced this week, covers a scheme that spanned from 2014 to 2020 and involved spoofing in U.S. Treasuries markets—tactics that distorted prices and eroded trust in one of the world’s most vital financial arenas.
At its core, the case zeroed in on two ex-traders on BofA’s U.S. Treasuries desk who allegedly placed hundreds of fake orders to manipulate both cash and futures markets.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
What is Spoofing?
Spoofing, as regulators describe it, involves flooding the market with bogus bids or offers that have no intention of being executed, all to create a false sense of supply or demand and profit off the resulting price swings.
The DOJ pegged the duo as collectively entering upward of 1,000 such suspect orders, with one trader, Tyler Forbes, already pleading guilty to securities manipulation charges.
The settlement breaks down to $1.96 million in disgorgement—essentially handing back ill-gotten gains—and $3.6 million funneled into a victim compensation fund.
Crucially, there’s no admission of liability from BofA Securities, and the bank walks away without prosecution, thanks to what the DOJ called its “timely and voluntary self-disclosure,” full cooperation, and beefed-up internal controls like comprehensive trading reviews and enhanced compliance measures.
A BofA spokesperson declined to comment on the matter, leaving the bank’s side of the story to the DOJ’s glowing assessment.
But for retail investors—the everyday folks dipping into stocks and bonds via apps like Robinhood or their 401(k)s—this outcome has sparked a fresh wave of bitterness.
Retail Investors Face an Uphill Battle
Online forums and social media are buzzing with frustration, with many viewing the payout as little more than a “slap on the wrist” for a behemoth that posted $28.7 billion in profits last year alone.
“It’s bribery, plain and simple,” vented one investor on Reddit’s r/investing thread, echoing a sentiment rippling through comment sections on Yahoo Finance and Seeking Alpha.
“BofA tips off the feds, cooperates just enough, and pays pocket change to make it all go away. Meanwhile, we’re the ones left holding the bag when these manipulations tank our portfolios.”
The post, which garnered over 500 upvotes in hours, captured a broader disillusionment: retail traders, already scarred by events like the 2021 GameStop saga and crypto crashes, see settlements like this as proof the system is stacked against them.
That distrust runs deep.
Online comments paint a picture of a financial ecosystem where big banks buy their way out of accountability, leaving mom-and-pop investors to foot the bill through volatile markets and eroded confidence.
“How many times do we have to watch this movie?” wrote another user on Twitter.
“Spoofing screws with Treasury yields, which jacks up mortgage rates and borrowing costs for all of us. And BofA settles for less than what they make in a day of trading fees? Lost faith in the whole damn thing—it’s all a casino rigged for the house.”
A Story Told Too Many Times
This isn’t hyperbole in the eyes of critics.
The case echoes a 2023 FINRA settlement where BofA Securities ponied up $24 million for supervisory lapses tied to the same spoofing episode, including failures to catch the traders’ antics.
FINRA’s then-head of enforcement, Bill St. Louis, didn’t mince words at the time: “Spoofing undermines the transparency and integrity of the markets by distorting the true nature of supply and demand.”
Yet even that larger fine felt paltry to many, especially given the trillions in Treasuries traded daily, where tiny manipulations can cascade into massive losses for bondholders and everyday borrowers.
Retail investors’ outrage isn’t isolated.
A quick scan of investor message boards shows parallels to gripes over past BofA deals, like the bank’s $16.65 billion mortgage fraud settlement in 2014 or the $2.43 billion payout over the Merrill Lynch merger disclosures.
In each instance, the common thread is a sense that penalties are too light, too late, and designed more to quiet lawsuits than deliver justice.
“We’re not asking for the world—just equal rules,” one commenter lamented.
“But every time, it’s the little guy who gets squeezed while the banks laugh to the bank.”
As BofA integrates its Merrill Lynch arm deeper into its operations—now a powerhouse generating billions in wealth management revenue—the settlement serves as a reminder of lingering scars from the financial crisis era.
For those retail voices crying foul, it’s not just about the $5.56 million; it’s about a system that keeps proving it’s built to protect the powerful at their expense.
With interest rates still biting and markets jittery, that lost trust could keep sidelining the very investors Wall Street claims to serve.
Also Read: Gensler Now Under Fire For Deleted Messages Driving MMTLP Speculation
