- SpaceX poised to receive a $2 billion role in Trump’s $175 billion "Golden Dome" missile-tracking satellite constellation.
- The Trump–Musk reconciliation preserves vital SpaceX federal contracts despite prior threats, exposing U.S. reliance on one private provider.
- Concerns grow about vendor lock, rushed 2028 test timelines, and implications for competition, cost, and national security oversight.
WASHINGTON—In the high-stakes world of American space policy, where billion-dollar contracts can make or break ambitions from the moon to missile defense, the relationship between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk has been nothing short of a rollercoaster.
Just months after a public blowup that put billions in federal deals on the line, Musk’s SpaceX is poised to snag a $2 billion chunk of Trump’s ambitious “Golden Dome” missile shield project.
The move, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, underscores how intertwined the two men’s orbits remain—despite the fireworks—and raises fresh questions about the balance of power, innovation, and national security in U.S. space efforts.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
At the heart of this latest chapter is SpaceX’s expected role in building an “air moving target indicator” network, a constellation of up to 600 satellites designed to track incoming missiles and aircraft in real time.
Unveiled by Trump in May alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during an Oval Office briefing, the Golden Dome is Trump’s vision for a layered defense system priced at a staggering $175 billion—though experts caution the true tab could balloon to half a trillion dollars, potentially sparking a new arms race in orbit.
Funding for the initial satellite work was tucked into Trump’s July tax-and-spend package, but until now, no specific contractor had been publicly linked to the effort.
Sources briefed on the plans tell the Journal that SpaceX’s unmatched launch cadence and manufacturing prowess—bolstered by over 10,000 Starlink satellites already in orbit—gave it the edge.
This isn’t just about satellites; it’s a test of whether Trump and Musk, who patched up their summer spat at a September memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, can keep their alliance from derailing one of the administration’s flagship initiatives.
“What we’re relying on is industry to help us innovate by showing us the art of the possible—bringing ideas to us,” U.S. Space Force Chief of Space Operations Gen. Chance Saltzman said in comments to the Journal, highlighting the military’s push for private-sector speed over traditional bureaucracy.
SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell echoed that sentiment in investor briefings, stressing the company’s commitment to U.S. priorities in times of conflict.
Trump and Elon Musk Rekindle Their Relationship in Epic Collaboration
The reconciliation feels worlds away from June, when the duo’s bromance imploded over a spending bill Musk derided as a “disgusting abomination.”
Trump fired back on Truth Social, threatening to axe Musk’s government subsidies and contracts to save “Billions and Billions of Dollars,” even musing that Biden hadn’t done it sooner.
Musk, never one to back down, posted on X (formerly Twitter) that SpaceX would immediately begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft—the only U.S. vehicle capable of ferrying astronauts to the International Space Station—under a roughly $5 billion NASA pact.
“In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,” Musk wrote, a move that could have stranded NASA crews and forced a humiliating pivot back to Russian Soyuz rockets.
That threat sent shockwaves through Washington, exposing America’s deep reliance on SpaceX.
A Reuters tally pegged the company’s at-risk federal contracts at $22 billion, with NASA alone accounting for about $15 billion since 2015—covering everything from crewed ISS missions to the $843 million U.S. Deorbit Vehicle for safely retiring the aging station by 2030.
“SpaceX is not like the appendix but a vital organ in everything the United States is doing in space,” said Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Aerospace Security Project.
Experts like Lori Garver, a former NASA deputy administrator, called the episode “really disconcerting,” warning it spotlighted the risks of pinning national security on one individual’s whims.
Behind the scenes, the White House ordered the Pentagon and NASA to compile “scorecards” on SpaceX deals—detailing values, alternatives, and termination costs—amid fears of retaliation.
The review, per insiders cited by the Daily Mail and The Telegraph, ultimately preserved most contracts, deeming them irreplaceable amid slim competition from players like Boeing-Lockheed’s United Launch Alliance or Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin.
Benjamin L. Schmitt, a senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania’s Department of Physics and Astronomy, noted that scrapping SpaceX’s crewed flights would reverse a “major breakthrough for U.S. independence from Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft,” harking back to post-Shuttle era dependencies.
SpaceX Becomes a Force to Reckon with As U.S. Space Leader
Even as tensions simmered, SpaceX kept racking up wins. In April, the U.S. Space Force handed the company a $5.9 billion pact for 28 national security launches, cementing its role as the Pentagon’s top rocket provider.
By early 2025, SpaceX held nearly $8 billion in Pentagon work, including Starlink terminals for troops and a $70 million Space Force deal for satellite internet.
Trump’s May budget proposal funneled billions toward commercial systems like those SpaceX dominates, shifting NASA focus from the over-budget Artemis moon program—where SpaceX holds the $2.6 billion Human Landing System contract—to Musk-favored Mars ambitions.
Critics, though, see red flags in the coziness. A Reuters investigation revealed that Trump’s Air Force Secretary nominee, Troy Meink—a holdover from the National Reconnaissance Office—allegedly tailored a multibillion-dollar spy satellite solicitation to favor SpaceX in 2021, prompting an internal probe.
And in February, SpaceX scored a $38.85 million NASA contract for unspecified work, drawing online ire for hypocrisy as Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) slashed billions elsewhere, including $900 million at the Education Department.
“F**k you Elon Musk,” one social media user fumed, pointing to SpaceX’s $19.8 billion in federal pacts since 2008.
A Pentagon Defense Science Board study last year urged safeguards against “vendor lock,” pushing for broader commercial involvement to curb costs and stifle innovation.
Yet with rivals like ULA still scaling up Vulcan rockets and Blue Origin’s New Glenn just hitting the pad, SpaceX’s grip seems ironclad. As one industry source put it to SpaceNews, the June threats were “bluster”—neither side could afford the fallout.
What This Development Means for America
The Golden Dome award could tip the scales toward stability, but it also spotlights the stakes. Trump wants early tests timed for the 2028 election—a “visible win” one defense official called “technically very risky.”
SpaceX is also eyeing two more Golden Dome gigs: the Milnet secure comms relay and a ground-targeting network.
If all pans out, it could add billions to SpaceX’s ledger, which Musk pegged at $15.5 billion for 2025, with $1.1 billion from NASA alone.
For now, the Trump-Musk saga rolls on, a blend of bravado and brilliance that’s propelled U.S. space dominance—but at what cost to checks and balances?
As NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens put it amid the feud: “NASA will continue to execute upon the President’s vision for the future of space.”
In orbit, at least, that vision still has SpaceX at its core.
Also Read: A DOJ Whistleblower Now Makes Revelation That Undermines the Judicial System’s Integrity
