- Major banks and exchanges enable a paper-heavy silver market where far more contracts exist than physical metal, mirroring naked shorting risks.
- Growing industrial demand, declining inventories, and delivery stresses could trigger a physical squeeze, sending silver prices sharply higher.
The silver market is on the edge of something big, and if you’re paying attention to commodities, you might want to sit up and take notice.
With global uncertainties piling up—from shaky economies to tech glitches in trading systems—experts are warning about potential disruptions that could send silver prices soaring.
But it’s not just about supply and demand; there’s a deeper layer involving how the markets are structured, where paper promises far outstrip actual metal.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
This isn’t some wild conspiracy—it’s rooted in how exchanges operate, and it echoes practices like naked shorting that we’ve seen blow up in other markets.
Let’s break this down step by step, because understanding the mechanics could make all the difference for investors eyeing precious metals right now.
How Silver Trading Really Works: The Paper vs. Physical Gap
At its core, the silver market relies on a system of futures contracts and derivatives traded on big exchanges like the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and the LBMA (London Bullion Market Association).
These aren’t just simple buy-and-sell deals; most of the time, they’re settled with cash instead of handing over actual bars of silver.
Historical data from the CME’s COMEX shows that only about 2% of these contracts end in physical delivery—the rest, a whopping 98%, get cashed out or rolled over to later dates.
This setup keeps things liquid and efficient when everything’s calm.
But here’s where it gets interesting: it operates on fractional reserve principles, much like banks do with your deposits.
Total claims on silver can exceed the physical stuff sitting in vaults, thanks to something called rehypothecation.
That’s when banks and institutions use the same ounce of silver as collateral for multiple loans or trades, layering claims on top of each other.
Sound familiar? This is strikingly similar to naked shorting in stocks, where sellers create synthetic shares without actually borrowing the real ones, flooding the market with more supply than exists.
In silver, it’s the same idea: paper contracts multiply beyond the physical backing, suppressing prices and creating artificial abundance.
If too many people suddenly call in those claims for real metal—boom, you’ve got a squeeze on your hands, just like we’ve seen in meme stocks but on a commodity scale.
What’s Fueling the Potential Disruptions?
Several forces are converging to stress this system, and they’re not letting up anytime soon. First off, industrial demand is relentless. Silver’s a key player in solar panels, electronics, and electric vehicles—think 25-35 grams per EV for switches and contacts.
The solar sector alone gobbles up about 10% of global silver, growing 8-12% yearly per U.S. Geological Survey stats. Electronics chewed through 268 million ounces in 2022, according to The Silver Institute.
Then there’s the money side. Central banks’ loose policies, like the Fed’s money supply expansions, are eroding currency value and pushing folks toward hard assets like silver as an inflation hedge.
Geopolitics adds fuel: countries are diversifying reserves away from the dollar.
Central banks snapped up 1,037 tonnes of gold in 2022—the second-highest on record, per the World Gold Council via CNBC.
Nations like Germany, India, and Hungary are even bringing their gold home, signaling a shift toward more control over tangible assets.
And don’t forget the tech glitches. Exchanges aren’t immune to breakdowns—a recent 10-hour CME outage hit oil, gold, and silver right when prices were volatile.
Blamed on cooling system failures, it sparked questions about whether these are just accidents or something more, especially coinciding with delivery pressures.
In a world where trading is all digital, these vulnerabilities could freeze markets and expose the naked shorting-like imbalances.
Supply Realities: Deficits and Declining Stocks
Global silver production hovers around 850 million ounces a year, with Mexico leading at 180 million, Peru at 120 million, and China at about 110 million, based on U.S. Geological Survey figures.
But demand tops 1 billion ounces annually, per the Silver Institute, leading to ongoing deficits.
Inventories are thinning out.
COMEX warehouses show declining registered stocks, while LBMA deliveries stretch from days to weeks during high demand.
Shanghai’s vaults are at decade lows, with China exporting to the West amid rising domestic needs.
Mining costs—$12-18 per ounce all-in—set a price floor, but hedging by producers can tighten spot supply further.Here’s a quick snapshot of regional trends:
| Region | Inventory Trend | Supply Indicators | Delivery Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMEX | Declining | Backwardation signals | Normal processing |
| LBMA | Constrained | Extended timeframes | Delayed deliveries |
| Shanghai | Reduced | Decade-low levels | Regional tightness |
China’s role is huge here. Through the Shanghai Gold Exchange and the Belt and Road Initiative, they’re building alternatives to Western markets, potentially using silver in new trade systems.
This strategic hoarding could amplify global shortages.
Lessons from Past Crises and the Manipulation Angle
Remember March 2020? Gold futures tanked relative to spot prices, with premiums over 3% amid delivery chaos.
It exposed how paper-heavy systems crack under pressure.
Outages like the recent CME one fuel theories of manipulation—timing too perfect during stress points.
But separating fact from suspicion is key; regulators watch, but perfect oversight?
Not in these complex setups.
Historically, currency resets boost precious metals.
The 1971 Nixon Shock shot gold from $35 to over $800 an ounce by 1980. Weimar Germany’s hyperinflation wiped out paper money but spared gold and silver holders.
In today’s debasement era, silver could follow suit.
Smart Moves for Investors in This Environment
So, what should you do? Physical ownership cuts out the middleman risks—no counterparty worries like with ETFs such as SLV, which holds $16.2 billion but could face redemptions in a crunch.
Storage costs 0.5-2% yearly, but it’s worth it for peace of mind. Allocate 5-15% of your portfolio to metals, diversifying between gold and silver based on ratios—high ratios favor silver now.
Watch for backwardation (when futures are cheaper than spot) as a squeeze signal.
And remember, in a naked shorting-style setup, a rush for physical could force prices up fast, rewarding those who act early.
The silver market’s vulnerabilities aren’t going away in 2025.
With supply chains strained and paper claims ballooning, we’re potentially looking at a delivery crisis that echoes past squeezes.
Keep an eye on inventories, exchange news, and global shifts—they could be the difference between missing out and capitalizing on the next big move.
What do you think—time to stock up on physical silver, or wait it out?
Also Read: Short Sellers Are Now Throwing One Another Under the Bus
