- Pentagon opened a formal investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly for a video urging troops to prioritize the Constitution, possibly triggering recall and court‑martial.
- The probe intensified partisan backlash, with Democrats calling it weaponization of the military and Republicans defending accountability for undermining command.
In a move that has stunned Capitol Hill and reignited debates over the boundaries between military duty and political speech, the Pentagon announced Monday it is launching a formal investigation into Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a decorated Navy veteran and former NASA astronaut, over allegations he undermined troop morale in a recent video message to U.S. service members.
The probe, which could lead to Kelly’s unprecedented recall to active duty for a potential court-martial, stems directly from a heated exchange with President Donald Trump, who last week branded the senator’s words as “seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH.”
This extraordinary escalation highlights deepening tensions in Trump’s second term, where criticism of executive orders is increasingly portrayed as a threat to national security.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
Kelly, 61, who flew nearly 40 combat missions as a Navy fighter pilot before commanding space shuttle missions, appeared in a two-minute video released last Tuesday alongside five other former military and intelligence officials.
The clip, produced by a bipartisan group of lawmakers concerned about potential abuses of power, urged active-duty personnel to prioritize the Constitution above all.
“You can refuse illegal orders,” Kelly said plainly in the video, his voice steady against a backdrop of American flags and military insignia.
Other participants, including Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), a former Army Ranger, echoed the sentiment: “Our servicemembers take an oath to the Constitution and have an obligation to follow only lawful orders.”
The message was a direct response to Trump’s post-election rhetoric, including threats to deploy troops against domestic “enemies” and his firing of several high-ranking officers deemed disloyal.
But what began as a call for constitutional fidelity quickly spiraled into a firestorm.
Trump, reacting on Truth Social, reposted a user’s demand to “HANG THEM” and accused Kelly and his colleagues of fomenting rebellion.
A Veteran Under Fire: Kelly’s Stellar Record Meets Political Crosshairs
Mark Kelly’s path to the Senate is the stuff of American legend.
Born in Orange, New Jersey, he graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1986 and logged over 5,000 flight hours in the cockpit of F-14 Tomcats and F/A-18 Hornets, earning the Distinguished Flying Cross for his Gulf War service.
Later, as a NASA astronaut, he commanded the space shuttle Endeavour twice, once in 2011 while his twin brother Scott orbited Earth on a complementary mission.
His political awakening came in 2011, when his wife, former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, survived an assassination attempt in Tucson that left six dead and 13 wounded, including Giffords herself with a severe brain injury.
Kelly stepped away from NASA to care for her, co-founding a gun violence prevention group, and won her House seat in a 2020 special election before securing a full Senate term in 2022.
Now, that service record is being weaponized against him.
The Pentagon’s statement, posted on X by the rebranded “Department of War,” cites “serious allegations of misconduct against Captain Mark Kelly, USN (Ret.)” under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 2387, which bars actions that “interfere with… the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the armed forces.”
Officials say the review could trigger Kelly’s recall under 10 U.S.C. § 688, a rarely invoked law allowing the defense secretary to summon retirees for up to five years post-service.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a Fox News alum and Trump loyalist, wasted no time in amplifying the charges.
“Kelly’s conduct brings discredit upon the armed forces and will be addressed appropriately,” Hegseth said in a statement, calling the video “despicable, reckless and false” and warning that “encouraging our warriors to ignore the orders of their commanders undermines every aspect of ‘good order and discipline.’”
Legal experts note the irony: The U.S. Manual for Courts-Martial explicitly states that troops must disobey “patently illegal orders,” such as those commanding crimes.
“This isn’t sedition; it’s a reminder of the oath every soldier takes,” said Rachel VanLandingham, a former Air Force judge advocate and law professor at Southwestern Law School.
“Probing a sitting senator for echoing military doctrine sets a chilling precedent.”
Kelly Strikes Back: ‘Words Have Consequences’
Kelly, who learned of the investigation via the Pentagon’s social media post, has not minced words in the days leading up to today’s announcement.
Speaking on CBS’s Face the Nation Sunday, he lamented the silence from his GOP colleagues: “We’ve heard very little, basically crickets, from Republicans in the United States Congress about what the president has said about hanging members of Congress.”
Earlier, on Thursday, Kelly invoked his wife’s near-fatal shooting in a poignant X post: “My wife @GabbyGiffords nearly lost her life in an act of political violence. Words have consequences, especially when they come from the President of the United States. What Trump said this morning — that my colleagues and I should be put to death — is dangerous.”
He added, “We can disagree fiercely… without resorting to stoking violence. Unfortunately, we’ve seen that at every turn, Donald Trump looks for opportunities to divide us.”
On Friday’s MSNBC Morning Joe, Kelly grew more personal, expressing fear for his family’s safety: “This kind of language is dangerous, and it’s wrong,” he said, alluding to the 2011 Tucson massacre that still haunts the couple.
By Sunday, in another X video, he doubled down: “Two months ago Trump and Republicans were saying we need to dial back the rhetoric. Now the President himself suggests members of Congress should be hanged, and it’s crickets.”
A Kelly spokesperson told reporters Monday afternoon that the senator “stands by his words and his service,” declining further comment to avoid prejudicing the review.
But in a Friday X post, Kelly issued a defiant vow: “Donald Trump may be surrounding himself with yes men and firing admirals and generals he doesn’t like, but he can’t fire us. We aren’t going anywhere and we will ALWAYS defend the Constitution and the rule of law.”
Bipartisan Backlash and Broader Implications
The announcement has cleaved Washington along familiar lines.
Democrats decried it as authoritarian overreach.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called it “a blatant weaponization of the military against political opponents,” vowing Senate oversight hearings.
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, labeled the probe “retaliatory nonsense” that erodes trust in the Pentagon.
Republicans, meanwhile, rallied behind Trump.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), a former Army officer, tweeted that Kelly’s video was “a direct attack on chain of command” and applauded the investigation as “necessary accountability.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) echoed the sentiment, saying on Fox News that “retired officers don’t get a free pass to incite division.”
Veterans’ groups are watching warily.
The Veterans of Foreign Wars issued a statement affirming that “disobeying unlawful orders is core to our code,” while cautioning against politicizing the UCMJ.
On X, reactions poured in: One user hailed it as “FAFO” for Kelly, while another called it “stupidity weaponized” by an “incompetent” leadership.
As the probe unfolds—expected to take weeks, if not months—this case could redefine the fragile balance between civilian oversight and military autonomy.
Also Read: A DOJ Whistleblower Now Makes Revelation That Undermines the Judicial System’s Integrity
