- Documents show Delegate Stacey Plaskett texted convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a February 2019 House Oversight hearing.
- Epstein actively coached Plaskett on questions about Michael Cohen and Trump associates, messages aligning with her on-record questioning.
- Plaskett’s office downplayed texts as one of many inputs; revelations raise concerns about Epstein’s lingering political influence.
In a startling disclosure that’s raising eyebrows across Washington, documents have surfaced showing that Delegate Stacey Plaskett, the Democratic representative from the U.S. Virgin Islands, was in direct communication with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a high-stakes congressional hearing back in 2019.
This exchange, which involved real-time texting about how to grill Michael Cohen—Donald Trump’s former lawyer—highlights an unexpected connection between a sitting lawmaker and one of the most notorious figures in recent American scandals.
The hearing in question was a February 2019 session of the House Oversight Committee, where Cohen was testifying against Trump, spilling details about the inner workings of the Trump Organization.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
According to the newly released files, Epstein wasn’t just a passive observer; he was actively feeding Plaskett suggestions on lines of questioning aimed at tarnishing Trump’s image.
The Text Exchanges: A Play-by-Play from the Hearing
The documents paint a vivid picture of the back-and-forth. At one point, Epstein texted Plaskett: “Cohen brought up RONA — keeper of the secrets.”
This was a reference to Rhona Graff, Trump’s longtime executive assistant, though Epstein misspelled her name. Plaskett, apparently gearing up for her turn at the microphone, shot back quickly: “RONA?? Quick I’m up next is that an acronym.”
Epstein clarified right away: “That’s his assistant.”
It didn’t stop there. Epstein seemed to be coaching her on strategy, texting:
“Hes opened the door to questions re who are the other henchmen at trump org.”
Plaskett responded affirmatively: “Yup. Very aware and waiting my turn.”
When it was her moment in the spotlight, Plaskett dove into questions about Trump associates, specifically naming Graff and Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization’s CFO—figures that aligned closely with Epstein’s tips.
As the hearing wrapped up her segment, Epstein followed up with a congratulatory message: “Good work.”
These messages were pieced together from files where Plaskett’s name was redacted, but the timing synced perfectly with her on-the-record actions during the hearing.
Her office didn’t deny the interactions, confirming that she had indeed texted with Epstein.
Plaskett’s Office Responds: “Broader Input” from Various Sources
In a statement addressing the revelations, Plaskett’s team downplayed the significance of the texts.
They explained that during such an intense hearing, she received input from a wide array of people, and Epstein’s messages were just part of that mix.
“She welcomes information that helps her get at the truth,” her office stated, framing the exchange as nothing more than helpful intel in pursuit of accountability.
This response comes amid growing scrutiny over Epstein’s lingering influence even after his 2008 conviction in Florida for procuring a minor for prostitution, where he served time.
By 2019, Epstein was already a registered sex offender, and later that year, he faced federal charges for sex trafficking before his death in jail.
Epstein’s Shadow: A Reminder of His Vast Network
Epstein’s ability to insert himself into political circles, even from afar, underscores the breadth of his connections.
Known for rubbing shoulders with powerful figures from both sides of the aisle, his involvement here adds another layer to the ongoing questions about how deep his influence ran.
For Plaskett, who has built a reputation as a tough questioner on issues like oversight and ethics, this link could prompt further examination of how external advice shapes congressional proceedings.
As more documents like these come to light, it’s a stark reminder of the blurred lines between personal networks and public duty.
What other surprises might be lurking in Epstein’s communications?
For now, this episode shines a light on a moment when a Democrat’s pursuit of truth intersected with one of the darkest figures in modern history.
Also Read: A DOJ Whistleblower Now Makes Revelation That Undermines the Judicial System’s Integrity
