- Krugman warns the U.S. economy is "schizoid," split between destabilizing, unpredictable tariffs and speculative forces.
- AI investment boom mirrors the dot‑com bubble; monetary easing may mask overvaluation but won’t fix underlying weaknesses.
- Tariff unpredictability and a potential AI collapse could trigger recession that the Fed likely cannot avert.
In an era where global markets swing wildly between euphoria and dread, one of the sharpest minds in economics has issued a stark cautionary note.
Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist known for his incisive takes on trade and fiscal policy, is sounding the alarm on what he sees as a dangerously unstable U.S. economy in 2025.
His latest analysis paints a picture of a nation caught in a bizarre tug-of-war: one side dragged down by erratic trade policies, the other artificially inflated by speculative fervor in artificial intelligence.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
It’s a volatile mix that could tip the scales toward recession—and Krugman isn’t mincing words about who might be to blame.
Details of the Report
Writing in his Substack newsletter this week, Krugman describes the current economic landscape as nothing short of “schizoid.”
On one hand, President Donald Trump’s aggressive overhaul of U.S. trade policy has upended decades of established norms.
“Donald Trump abruptly reversed 90 years of U.S. trade policy, breaking all our international agreements, and pushed tariffs to levels not seen since the 1930s,” Krugman observes.
“Worse, the tariffs keep changing unpredictably.”
These fluctuations aren’t just policy footnotes; they’re actively stifling business confidence.
“This uncertainty is clearly bad for business and is depressing the economy,” he adds bluntly.
Trump’s tariffs, which took effect earlier this year, were touted as a shield for American industries against foreign competition.
But Krugman argues they’ve backfired spectacularly, echoing the protectionist missteps of the Great Depression era.
Businesses, already grappling with supply chain disruptions and rising costs, are left guessing month to month. Will aluminum imports face a 25% levy today and 50% tomorrow?
The unpredictability has chilled investments and hiring, creating a drag on growth that feels all too familiar to historians of economic downturns.
It’s a reminder of how quickly bold political gambles can sour into widespread pain for workers and consumers alike.
Yet, even as these headwinds build, another force is pulling in the opposite direction—one that’s equal parts exhilarating and illusory.
How AI is Changing the US Economy in Real-Time
Enter the AI boom, a torrent of capital pouring into machine learning startups, data centers, and everything in between.
Krugman likens it directly to the dot-com frenzy of the late 1990s, that glittering bubble which promised a new technological utopia before bursting and wiping out trillions in market value.
“On the other hand, there has simultaneously been a huge boom in AI-related investment, which is boosting the economy,” he writes, capturing the paradox perfectly.
This AI surge has been a market darling, with tech giants and venture funds betting big on the transformative power of generative models and automation.
Stock indices tracking the so-called “Magnificent Seven”—Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and their peers—have soared, reflecting investor bets on an AI-driven future.
But Krugman spots red flags everywhere. Recently, these stocks dipped sharply, only to rebound with startling speed.
Why the whiplash? He points to whispers in analyst circles and Federal Reserve signals hinting at imminent interest rate cuts.
“Analyst chatter about supposed causes of stock market swings should always be taken with many grains of salt,” Krugman cautions.
“But it’s clear that this surge was catalyzed by remarks by Fed officials which the market interpreted as making a cut in the Fed Funds rate next month more likely.”
It’s a classic tale of monetary policy as market morphine: easy money from the Fed can numb the pain of overvaluation, but it doesn’t cure the underlying disease.
As doubts about AI’s real-world payoffs begin to surface—questions about profitability, scalability, and whether the emperor has any code at all—investors are turning their gaze to Jerome Powell’s successor.
Economic Policy Overhaul
Rumors swirl that Trump’s pick for Fed chair could be someone like Kevin Hassett, the former economic advisor whose views on deregulation might prioritize political loyalty over stability.
Krugman isn’t optimistic. “So as doubts about AI creep in, I’m hearing growing chatter to the effect that the Fed can and should save the industry,” he notes.
“But the lesson from the last big tech bubble is that it can’t. In fact, I have doubts about whether the Fed can head off a broader recession if the tech boom collapses—but that’s a topic for a future post.”
And there’s the rub: in this bifurcated economy, salvation from one quarter could mean sabotage from another.
If the AI bubble deflates—and history suggests it might, given the parallels to past manias—the fallout could cascade through job markets, pension funds, and beyond.
Trump’s tariff roulette only amplifies the risk, eroding the buffers that might otherwise cushion a hard landing.
“My point is that if you’re worried about an AI bubble, don’t expect Jerome Powell or his Trump-appointed successor… to come to the rescue,” Krugman concludes with a touch of wry fatalism.
“They can’t.”
What Happens Now?
Krugman’s voice carries weight not just because of his Nobel for dissecting international trade imbalances, but because he’s been a consistent skeptic of hype-driven growth.
His warnings come at a pivotal moment, as markets digest fresh data on inflation and employment that already show cracks forming.
For everyday Americans—small business owners navigating import costs, tech workers riding the AI rollercoaster, or retirees watching their 401(k)s—this isn’t abstract theory.
It’s the ground shifting beneath their feet.
As 2025 unfolds, the question lingers: Can policymakers thread the needle between innovation and insanity?
Or are we sleepwalking toward a crisis that makes 2008 look like a blip?
Krugman’s post doesn’t offer easy answers, but it demands we pay attention. In economics, as in life, ignoring the storm clouds rarely ends well.
Also Read: A DOJ Whistleblower Now Makes Revelation That Undermines the Judicial System’s Integrity
