- Trump administration deploying 100+ ICE and CBP agents to Alameda, signaling intensified immigration enforcement in the San Francisco Bay Area.
- Local leaders and California officials vow lawsuits and legal challenges, arguing federal forces lack authority and threaten civil rights.
- Community groups prepare protests, know-your-rights trainings, amid fears of broader profiling and clashes over enforcement tactics.
In a bold move that has ignited tensions between federal authorities and local leaders, the Trump administration is sending more than 100 federal agents to the San Francisco Bay Area for a major immigration enforcement operation.
Agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are set to arrive at Coast Guard Base Alameda starting Thursday, according to multiple sources familiar with the plans.
This deployment comes amid President Donald Trump’s repeated vows to intensify immigration crackdowns in Democratic strongholds like San Francisco, framing them as essential for public safety and economic protection.
The FrankNez Media Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.
The operation appears to be a precursor to potential National Guard involvement, similar to deployments in other cities such as Los Angeles, Memphis, Chicago, Washington, D.C., and Portland.
In those locations, federal forces have supported immigration raids, often leading to protests and legal challenges.
Trump has hinted at invoking the Insurrection Act to deploy troops domestically, a controversial law that grants presidents broad authority to use military forces on U.S. soil.
On Sunday, during an interview on Fox News, Trump specifically targeted San Francisco, stating: “We’re going to San Francisco and we’ll make it great. It’ll be great again. San Francisco is a great city. It won’t be great if it keeps going like this. We’re gonna go to San Francisco. The difference is they want us in San Francisco.”
His comments followed remarks by U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, who earlier this week suggested agents were en route to the city.
Local Leaders Vow Lawsuits
Local officials have pushed back fiercely against the impending operation.
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie argued that deploying federal forces would not enhance safety or address the city’s drug crisis, emphasizing that soldiers lack legal authority to arrest drug dealers.
City Attorney David Chiu has warned that his office is prepared to sue to prevent any deployment of troops to the city’s streets.
California Governor Gavin Newsom echoed these sentiments on Tuesday night, announcing plans to challenge the Trump administration in court if National Guard troops are mobilized.
The Coast Guard base in Alameda, part of the Department of Homeland Security alongside ICE and CBP, will serve as the staging ground for the agents.
While details of the operation remain closely guarded—sources spoke on condition of anonymity due to lack of authorization—experts warn that ICE agents may have broader leeway for aggressive tactics compared to National Guard troops, with fewer local mechanisms to intervene.
This surge occurs against a backdrop of heightened immigration enforcement under the Trump administration, including mass deportation plans that have alarmed Bay Area communities.
Immigrant rights groups are ramping up preparations, holding workshops on “know your rights” and establishing rapid response networks to monitor potential raids.
In San Francisco, where about 36% of residents are immigrants as of 2021, advocates report increased anxiety, with some fearing the operation could extend beyond undocumented individuals to affect U.S. citizens through racial profiling.
Injunctions vs. Supreme Court Rulings
Legal constraints in California add complexity.
In federal court districts covering parts of the state, including Sacramento and Kern counties, injunctions prohibit Border Patrol agents from stopping people without reasonable suspicion of immigration violations or based solely on appearance or language.
A similar order in Southern California was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, describing such stops as “brief” and noting that residents with proper documentation would be “promptly let go.”
However, reports from ProPublica indicate otherwise: At least 170 American citizens have been detained by immigration agents since Trump’s first term, sometimes involving violence or denial of rights.
The administration’s actions have already sparked controversy elsewhere.
In the Eastern District of California, a U.S. attorney was reportedly fired after insisting Border Patrol comply with a profiling injunction during a January raid on farmworkers.
Recent operations in the Bay Area have included courthouse arrests and workplace raids, prompting lawsuits from local advocates to halt such practices and improve detention conditions.
Protests, Lawsuits, and Community Safety Plans Ahead
As agents arrive, the Bay Area braces for potential clashes.
Community leaders urge residents to develop safety plans and report suspicious activity, while federal officials maintain the operations are necessary to uphold immigration laws.
With lawsuits looming and protests likely, this deployment could mark a flashpoint in the ongoing national debate over immigration policy.
Also Read: A DOJ Whistleblower Now Makes Revelation That Undermines the Judicial System’s Integrity
